Abstract The global expansion of judicial power is one of the most significant developments in late-twentieth and early twenty-first-century government. Scholars have identified this trend as the ‘judicialization of politics’, ‘governing with judges’, and ‘juristocracy’, conceptualizing judges as ‘legislators in robes’ and suggesting that our time may well be defined as the ‘Judicial Era’. This chapter focuses on three key aspects of this trend: (i) the dramatic increase in the number and types of national and transnational courts and tribunals; (ii) the ever-growing significance of courts and judges in determining political and policy-making outcomes worldwide; and (iii) criticism of, resistance to, and occasional backlash against expanded judicial power. It concludes by suggesting that from epistemological and methodological standpoints, the global expansion of judicial power provides new opportunities to develop and test arguments concerning judicial behaviour across time and place. The rise of law, courts, and judges as critical forces in comparative and world politics further suggests that politics and law are becoming increasingly intertwined domains, affecting each other in intricate ways that are seldom acknowledged by doctrinal analyses. Consequently, traditional disciplinary boundaries between the study of law and politics become increasingly difficult to sustain.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.