SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews on the use of tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears
14 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews on the use of tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (2023)Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews …Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (2023)Spin in the Abstracts of Meta…Evaluation of Spin in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques and Standard Microdiscectomies for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation (2023)Evaluation of Spin in Systema…Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Orthopaedics: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2023)Assessment of Spin in the Abs…Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction (2022)Evaluation of spin in systema…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review (2021)Spin occurs in bariatric surg…Evaluation of “Spin” in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on Cataract Therapies (2021)Evaluation of “Spin” in the A…A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool (2019)A psychometric study found AM…Presence of ‘spin’ in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials (2018)Presence of ‘spin’ in the abs…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)A new classification of spin …Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Impact of Spin in the Abstrac…Level of Evidence of Presentations at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meetings (2012)Level of Evidence of Presenta…INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2009)How Do You Know It Is True? Integrity in Research and Publications (2015)Level of clinical evidence presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Scientific Meeting over 5 years (2010–2014) (2015)Level of evidence of free papers presented at the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congress from 2008 to 2016 (2016)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2017)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses (2019)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin (2020)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2 (2021)Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Evaluation of Spin Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Rotator Cuff Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma (2024)Evaluation of spin in reviews of biodegradable balloon spacers for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (2023)Reporting Bias in the Form of Positive Spin Is Highly Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews on Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
  • 2016A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity224 cited
  • 2019A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool207 cited
  • 2018Presence of ‘spin’ in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials48 cited
  • 2012Level of Evidence of Presentations at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meetings39 cited
  • 2022Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction34 cited
  • 2023Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Orthopaedics: A Cross-sectional Analysis17 cited
  • 2021Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review17 cited
  • 2023Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Evaluation of “Spin” in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on Cataract Therapies12 cited
  • 2023Evaluation of Spin in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques and Standard Microdiscectomies for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation11 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.