SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the quality of evidence production in rehabilitation. Results of the 5th Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodological Meeting
4 references·0 citing·20 second hopsampled
Improving the quality of evidence production in rehabilitation. Results of the 5th Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodological Meeting (2023)Improving the quality of evidence product…A systematic review that is ``rapid'' and ``living'': A specific answer to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)A systematic review that is `…The Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist (2019)The Randomized Controlled Tri…Methodological problems in rehabilitation research. Report from a cochrane rehabilitation methodology meeting (2019)Methodological problems in re…In Search of Solutions for Evidence Generation in Rehabilitation (2019)In Search of Solutions for Ev…The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research (2007)A Review of CONSORT Guidelines About Comparison Groups With a Focused Discussion on Implications for Rehabilitation Clinical Trials (2019)Compared to what? An analysis of the management of control groups in Cochrane reviews in neurorehabilitation (2019)One in 11 Cochrane Reviews Are on Rehabilitation Interventions, According to Pragmatic Inclusion Criteria Developed by Cochrane Rehabilitation (2019)Collaborating in response to COVID-19: editorial and methods initiatives across Cochrane (2020)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Recommendations for Reporting on Rehabilitation Interventions (2020)A systematic review opens the black box of "usual care" in stroke rehabilitation control groups and finds a black hole (2022)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis (2013)Clinical replicability of rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials reported in main journals is inadequate (2019)Cochrane Rehabilitation: 2019 annual report (2020)Current evidence from the Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist (RCTRACK) reporting guideline project (2021)Current Evidence From the Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist (RCTRACK) reporting guideline project (2021)Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps (2020)Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19 (2022)Are COVID-19 systematic reviews up to date and can we tell? A cross-sectional study (2023)A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2019The Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist50 cited
  • 2019Methodological problems in rehabilitation research. Report from a cochrane rehabilitation methodology meeting26 cited
  • 2021A systematic review that is ``rapid'' and ``living'': A specific answer to the COVID-19 pandemic24 cited
  • 2019In Search of Solutions for Evidence Generation in Rehabilitation14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work