SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review
16 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review (2023)Publics’ views on ethical challenges of a…The uselessness of AI ethics (2022)The uselessness of AI ethicsThe Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An E…An overview of content analysis (2020)An overview of content analys…The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The global landscape of AI et…Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives (2019)Technology to Support Aging i…Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Principles alone cannot guara…Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars (2018)Trust in driverless cars: Inv…Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm (2018)Transformative innovation pol…Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges (2018)Governing artificial intellig…“Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation (2018)“Citizen Science”? Rethinking…Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability (2016)Seeing without knowing: Limit…Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': The US, EU, and UK Approach (2016)Artificial Intelligence and t…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously (2009)Taking European Knowledge Soc…Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe (2006)Public Deliberation and Gover…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Factors Influencing the Reported Intention of Higher Vocational Computer Science Students in China to Use AI After Ethical Training: A Study in Guangdong Province (2025)Factors Influencing the Repor…UNESCO's AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities (2024)UNESCO's AI Ethics Principles…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Experience and Education. (1938)Experience and Education (1986)The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. (1990)The Platform Society (2018)Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2019)From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)What is data ethics? (2016)Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018)Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence (2019)Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda (2021)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants (2020)What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective (2020)The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust (2022)How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms (2016)Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (2018)Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities (2020)Governance of artificial intelligence (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS: A THEMATIC ANALYSIS RELATED TO SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (2009)Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions (2014)Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework (2021)Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model (1991)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment (2020)Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda (2022)Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks (2014)Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education (2020)Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2022)Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review (2022)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines6,172 cited
  • 2020An overview of content analysis2,815 cited
  • 2020The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines1,900 cited
  • 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI1,869 cited
  • 2016Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability1,828 cited
  • 2018Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges743 cited
  • 2016Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': The US, EU, and UK Approach732 cited
  • 2018Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars552 cited
  • 2018“Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation425 cited
  • 2018Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm408 cited
  • 2022The uselessness of AI ethics374 cited
  • 2009Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously355 cited
  • 2019Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

326 cited
  • 2006Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe303 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024UNESCO's AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities28 cited
    • 2025Factors Influencing the Reported Intention of Higher Vocational Computer Science Students in China to Use AI After Ethical Training: A Study in Guangdong Province8 cited