SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-based literature review: De-duplication a cornerstone for quality
13 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Evidence-based literature review: De-duplication a cornerstone for quality (2023)Evidence-based literature review: De-dupl…The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews (2023)The Automated Systematic Sear…Where to prospectively register a systematic review (2022)Where to prospectively regist…Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research (2022)Reducing systematic review bu…Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Managing overlap of primary s…Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references (2021)Considerations for conducting…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)De-duplication of database se…Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches (2015)Identifying and removing dupl…Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module (2015)Better duplicate detection fo…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Find Duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in Systematic Review (2013)Find Duplicates among the Pub…Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012)Why prospective registration …Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Impact of covert duplicate pu…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Adolescent Sport Participation and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical (1998)Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis (2004)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)From pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data (2015)Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator (2024)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Suicide risk and mortality among patients with cancer (2022)Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis (2023)Umbrella reviews: a methodological guide (2025)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The preregistration revolution (2018)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Steps in undertaking meta-analysis and addressing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (2023)Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis. (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2016De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote1,926 cited
  • 1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2012Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense374 cited
  • 2021Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews252 cited
  • 2021Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references251 cited
  • 2015Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module206 cited
  • 2022Where to prospectively register a systematic review193 cited
  • 2015Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches178 cited
  • 2022Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research115 cited
  • 2023The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews103 cited
  • 2013Find Duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in Systematic Review98 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.