SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Literature search in systematic reviews: How much is good enough?
7 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Literature search in systematic reviews: How much is good enough? (2023)Literature search in systematic reviews: …Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study (2022)Searching two or more databas…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners (2021)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Introduction to systematic re…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review (2022)The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis (2023)Meta-analysis accelerator: a comprehensive tool for statistical data conversion in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2024)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Determining the impact of mobile-based self-care applications on reducing anxiety in healthcare providers: a systematic review (2025)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review (2024)Ethical Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda (2024)Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations (2025)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2018Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis633 cited
  • 2022Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study167 cited
  • 2021Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners60 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work