SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Publications of National Institutes of Health–Funded Research, 1985-2020
11 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Publications of National Institutes of Health–Funded Research, 1985-2020 (2023)Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts …Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020 (2022)Trends in the Use of Promotio…The effect of writing style on success in grant applications (2022)The effect of writing style o…‘Our striking results demonstrate …’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype (2021)‘Our striking results demonst…Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives (2020)Hype in reports of clinical r…“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials (2019)“It is important to reinforce…Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)Use of positive and negative …Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Impact of Spin in the Abstrac…On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers (2013)On the time spent preparing g…Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? (2009)Marketing data: Has the rise …CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition (2008)Assessing frequency changes i…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The Structure of a Scientific Paper (1998)The counting house (2002)Mimicry in science? (2010)The Covid infodemic (2021)Variation across Speech and Writing (1988)Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: a multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach (2010)“Small is beautiful”: On the value of standard reference corpora for observing recent grammatical change (2012)Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space (2014)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)Classical peer review: an empty gun (2010)Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university (2017)Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence (2017)Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books (2010)A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics (2017)Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study (2019)Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science (2021)The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005)Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years (2021)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (2000)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Hyping the REF: promotional elements in impact submissions (2023)Linguistic positivity in soft and hard disciplines: temporal dynamics, disciplinary variation, and the relationship with research impact (2023)Comparing discursive reproductions of national military image between China and the United States (2025)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)A New Academic Word List (2000)Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse (2005)Promoting research by reducing uncertainty in academic writing: a large-scale diachronic case study on hedging in Science research articles across 25 years (2023)Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database * (1990)CORPUS LINGUISTICS: METHOD, THEORY, AND PRACTICE (2017)Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in National Institutes of Health Funding Opportunity Announcements, 1992-2020 (2022)Dialling back ‘impact’ claims: researchers should not be compelled to make policy claims based on single studies (2023)Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
  • 2008Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition242 cited
  • 2015Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis237 cited
  • 2013On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers157 cited
  • 2019“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials85 cited
  • 2021‘Our striking results demonstrate …’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype75 cited
  • 2022Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-202057 cited
  • 2009Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article?41 cited
  • 2020Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives38 cited
  • 2022The effect of writing style on success in grant applications25 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work