The Geospatial Generalization Problem: When Mobility Isn't Mobile

Abstract

Human mobility research has significantly benefited from recent advances in machine learning, as have numerous other industries. Aided by the ever-increasing availability of geospatial and mobility data, machine learning models have enabled large-scale systems for simulating city-wide macro and micro mobility behaviors, urban planning, transportation management, and disaster relief optimization. However, while many fields have invested significant effort in solving the model transferability and generalization problem, the inability of machine learning-based human mobility models to generalize to new locations has come to be implicitly accepted in most geospatial research. In this vision paper, we focus on this geospatial generalization problem, its root causes, and how it is restricting the applications of otherwise-promising research. Most importantly, we argue for several data- and modeling-driven innovations which could help remedy this problem, spanning mega-scale simulations, large foundation models, and multi-task, transfer, and meta-learning. We also spotlight a handful of promising ideas which have recently emerged from the community. We hope that these proposals take root and help develop more capable, flexible, and generalizable models in research and industry.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.