SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Actions of Scientific Journal Editors in China
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Actions of Scientific Journal Editors in China (2023)Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Acti…Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals: Results of an online questionnaire survey (2020)Chinese researchers' percepti…Evaluation and comparison of influence in international Open Access journals between China and USA (2019)Evaluation and comparison of …Agricultural Researchers' Attitudes Toward Open Access and Data Sharing (2019)Agricultural Researchers' Att…Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers (2017)Survey on open peer review: A…Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Publishing, Ever (2017)Predatory Journals: The Worst…Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017)Academics' behaviors and atti…Current status of open access journals published in D8 countries and registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (pre-2000 to 2014) (2016)Current status of open access…From Concerned to Cautiously Optimistic: Assessing Faculty Perceptions and Knowledge of Open Access in a Campus-Wide Study (2015)From Concerned to Cautiously …Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature (2014)Attitudes towards open access…A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals (2013)A longitudinal comparison of …Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of open access publis…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Culture of open access in the University of Kashmir: a researcher's viewpoint (2010)Culture of open access in the…A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing (2010)A longitudinal study of schol…Evolution of open access publishing in Chinese scientific journals (2008)Evolution of open access publ…A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews (2005)A reflection on the use of se…Authors and open access publishing (2004)Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) (2012)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals (2017)Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals (2018)Open Access in Theory and Practice (2020)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals (2015)Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: an analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009–2014 (2017)Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario (2018)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals (2017)Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus (2017)The citation advantage for open access science journals with and without article processing charges (2019)Diffusion of Innovations (1963)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? (2004)An examination of North American Library and Information Studies faculty perceptions of and experience with open-access scholarly publishing (2016)How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication (2000)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2018)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis (2021)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science (2019)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Psychology of Survey Response (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Riding the Wave of Open Access: Providing Library Research Support for Scholarly Publishing Literacy (2014)University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study (2015)Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship (2017)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data (2013)Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide (2016)Semi-structured Interviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2005A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews385 cited
  • 2012Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure372 cited
  • 2017Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers243 cited
  • 2013A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals116 cited
  • 2017Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals107 cited
  • 2010A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing101 cited
  • 2014Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature41 cited
  • 2008Evolution of open access publishing in Chinese scientific journals35 cited
  • 2015From Concerned to Cautiously Optimistic: Assessing Faculty Perceptions and Knowledge of Open Access in a Campus-Wide Study30 cited
  • 2010Culture of open access in the University of Kashmir: a researcher's viewpoint25 cited
  • 2020Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals: Results of an online questionnaire survey24 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Publishing, Ever23 cited
  • 2019Evaluation and comparison of influence in international Open Access journals between China and USA

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited
  • 2019Agricultural Researchers' Attitudes Toward Open Access and Data Sharing19 cited
  • 2016Current status of open access journals published in D8 countries and registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (pre-2000 to 2014)19 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.