SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consideration of overadjustment bias in guidelines and tools for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies is long overdue
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Consideration of overadjustment bias in guidelines and tools for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies is long overdue (2023)Consideration of overadjustment bias in g…Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Scoping review on interventio…Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols (2019)Risk of bias tools in systema…Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines (2019)Mapping of reporting guidance…Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—A review of recommended and commonly used tools (2018)Critical appraisal of nonrand…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…The impact of social disadvantage in moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease: an equity-focused systematic review* (2015)The impact of social disadvan…Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015)Extending the PRISMA statemen…Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (2013)Assessing Bias in Studies of …PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012)PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension:…Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? (2008)Reporting standards for resea…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…Methods in Social Epidemiology (2006)Methods in Social EpidemiologyMeta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement (2019)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North (1987)Measuring Social Class in US Public Health Research: Concepts, Methodologies, and Guidelines (1997)Neighborhood Disadvantage, Disorder, and Health (2001)Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China (2006)Is Segregation Bad for Your Health? (2009)Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness (2010)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2015)Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2013Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors3,273 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2006Methods in Social Epidemiology773 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2012PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity706 cited
  • 2008Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?571 cited
  • 2015Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration298 cited
  • 2019Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols246 cited
  • 2019Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

207 cited
  • 2019Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research153 cited
  • 2018Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—A review of recommended and commonly used tools144 cited
  • 2015The impact of social disadvantage in moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease: an equity-focused systematic review*111 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.