SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Overadjustment bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of socio-economic inequalities in health: a meta-research scoping review
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Overadjustment bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of socio-economic inequalities in health: a meta-research scoping review (2023)Overadjustment bias in systematic reviews…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes complications: A systematic review (2019)Socioeconomic inequalities an…COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology (2019)COSMOS-E: Guidance on conduct…Socioeconomic status and inflammation: a meta-analysis (2018)Socioeconomic status and infl…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …A systematic review of associations between non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic status within low- and lower-middle-income countries (2018)A systematic review of associ…Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. (2017)Is subjective social status a…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Social inequalities in early childhood health and development: a European-wide systematic review (2014)Social inequalities in early …Subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent health: A meta-analysis. (2013)Subjective socioeconomic stat…PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012)PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension:…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…Systematic Review of the Influence of Childhood Socioeconomic Circumstances on Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Adulthood (2005)Systematic Review of the Infl…Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Socioeconomic Inequalities in…Social inequalities and the common mental disorders (2003)Social inequalities and the c…Consideration of overadjustment bias in guidelines and tools for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies is long overdue (2023)Consideration of overadjustme…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement (2019)Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse (1997)Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies (1998)Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1 (2005)Premorbid (early life) IQ and Later Mortality Risk: Systematic Review (2006)Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care (2009)Early-Life Adversity and Physical and Emotional Health Across the Lifespan: A Neuroimmune Network Hypothesis (2015)A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change (1979)Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United States (1994)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Depression and anxiety in labor migrants and refugees – A systematic review and meta-analysis (2009)Childhood socioeconomic status and adult health (2010)Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from 2005 to 2015: widening disparities in vulnerable groups (2017)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Pravila PRISMA 2020. (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Religiosity and spirituality in the prevention and management of depression and anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)DSM-IV mood-, anxiety- and alcohol use disorders and their comorbidity in the Finnish general population (2004)Sex differences in the effect of education on depression: Resource multiplication or resource substitution? (2006)Age of onset of mental disorders and use of mental health services: needs, opportunities and obstacles (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2003Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis2,599 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2012PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity706 cited
  • 2005Systematic Review of the Influence of Childhood Socioeconomic Circumstances on Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Adulthood642 cited
  • 2003Social inequalities and the common mental disorders589 cited
  • 2019COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology522 cited
  • 2013Subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent health: A meta-analysis.456 cited
  • 2018Socioeconomic status and inflammation: a meta-analysis276 cited
  • 2017Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis.269 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2014Social inequalities in early childhood health and development: a European-wide systematic review262 cited
  • 2018A systematic review of associations between non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic status within low- and lower-middle-income countries228 cited
  • 2019Socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes complications: A systematic review196 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Consideration of overadjustment bias in guidelines and tools for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies is long overdue11 cited