SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review
11 references·13 citing·37 second hop
Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic…Using AI to write scholarly publications (2023)Using AI to write scholarly p…The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. (2023)The role of ChatGPT in scient…From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)From human writing to artific…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research (2023)ChatGPT: ethical concerns and…ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on r…Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts (2023)Chatbots, generative AI, and …Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing (2023)Can linguists distinguish bet…Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor (2023)Best Practices for Using AI T…Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT …Powering the Digital Economy: Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Finance (2021)Powering the Digital Economy:…Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)Artificial intelligence in sc…The Role of English Language and AI in Scientific Writing (2025)The Role of English Language …Proposing a framework for ethical use of AI in academic writing based on a conceptual review: implications for quality education (2025)Proposing a framework for eth…Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Large language models in peer…Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)Exploring the Impact of Gener…Addressing Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Generative AI’s Impact (2025)Addressing Academic Dishonest…Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study (2025)Academic misconduct and artif…Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Research ethics and issues re…Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review (2024)Navigating the Ethical Terrai…Benefits and Challenges of Using AI for Peer Review: A Study on Researchers’ Perceptions (2024)Benefits and Challenges of Us…Artificial intelligence in writing and research: ethical implications and best practices (2024)Artificial intelligence in wr…AI-powered peer review needs human supervision (2024)AI-powered peer review needs …“ChatGPT 4.0 Ghosted Us While Conducting Literature Search:” Modeling the Chatbot’s Generated Non-Existent References Using Regression Analysis (2024)“ChatGPT 4.0 Ghosted Us While…Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)The Janus Effect of Generative AI: Charting the Path for Responsible Conduct of Scholarly Activities in Information Systems (2023)Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science (2021)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? (2023)The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance (2024)Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place (2024)Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement (2024)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing (2024)Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity (2025)GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing (2025)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers (2023)Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Including Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT, in Scientific Publications: Policies of KJR and Prominent Authorities (2023)Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies (2024)A Comprehensive Study on Integration of Big Data and AI in Financial Industry and its Effect on Present and Future Opportunities (2024)Gen-AI (2024)AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges (2025)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering (2024)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
  • 2023From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing795 cited
  • 2023Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists610 cited
  • 2023The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.289 cited
  • 2023Using AI to write scholarly publications285 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing260 cited
  • 2021Powering the Digital Economy: Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Finance161 cited
  • 2023Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts130 cited
  • 2023Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor125 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research125 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers42 cited
  • 2024Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review42 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review35 cited
  • 2024“ChatGPT 4.0 Ghosted Us While Conducting Literature Search:” Modeling the Chatbot’s Generated Non-Existent References Using Regression Analysis26 cited
  • 2025Proposing a framework for ethical use of AI in academic writing based on a conceptual review: implications for quality education19 cited
  • 2024AI-powered peer review needs human supervision17 cited
  • 2025Addressing Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Generative AI’s Impact16 cited
  • 2025Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities15 cited
  • 2024Benefits and Challenges of Using AI for Peer Review: A Study on Researchers’ Perceptions15 cited
  • 2024Artificial intelligence in writing and research: ethical implications and best practices15 cited
  • 2026Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges13 cited
  • 2025Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study13 cited
  • 2025The Role of English Language and AI in Scientific Writing8 cited