SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
rworkflows: automating reproducible practices for the R community
7 references·0 citing·25 second hop
rworkflows: automating reproducible practices for the R community (2024)rworkflows: automating reproducible pract…The evolving crisis of the peer-review process (2022)The evolving crisis of the pe…Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends (2018)Peer reviewers unmasked: larg…Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce (2018)Changing demographics of scie…A Community of Practice Around Peer Review for Long-Term Research Software Sustainability (2018)A Community of Practice Aroun…A Survey of Bioinformatics Database and Software Usage through Mining the Literature (2016)A Survey of Bioinformatics Da…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics (2004)Bioconductor: open software d…How Companies Become Platform Leaders (2008)Computational science: ...Error (2010)Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature (2015)Automated workflow composition in mass spectrometry-based proteomics (2018)Investigating Software Usage in the Social Sciences: A Knowledge Graph Approach (2020)Softcite dataset: A dataset of software mentions in biomedical and economic research publications (2021)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Characterising reproducibility debt in scientific software: A systematic literature review (2024)Social Stratification in Science (1974)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Science of science (2018)Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (2020)The gendered nature of authorship (2021)Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus (2026)Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment (2018)A decade of marketing analytics and more to come: JMA insights (2023)Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers (2024)Text Mining Infrastructure in R (2008)A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome (2010)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation (2020)Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics12,180 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2018Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce158 cited
  • 2018Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends58 cited
  • 2016A Survey of Bioinformatics Database and Software Usage through Mining the Literature57 cited
  • 2022The evolving crisis of the peer-review process38 cited
  • 2018A Community of Practice Around Peer Review for Long-Term Research Software Sustainability18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work