SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

AI in Peer Review: Publishing’s Panacea or a Pandora’s Box of Problems? · Study

WorkAI in Peer Review: Publishing’s Panacea or a Pandora’s Box of Problems?

Karl A. Nath2024

OA

Workbronze2024

AI in Peer Review: Publishing’s Panacea or a Pandora’s Box of Problems?

Karl A. Nath · Morna Conway · Rafaël Fonseca

10 citations·0/0 files stored·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review 2023Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened 2023Using AI to write scholarly publications 2023Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots 2023Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor 2023How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing 2023Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2024AI-powered peer review needs human supervisionarticle · 6 shared references 2025Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewersarticle · 4 shared references 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveyarticle · 4 shared references 2023The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and researchreview · 3 shared references 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer reviewarticle · 3 shared references 2023Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editoreditorial · 3 shared references

Details

Year2024

Typeeditorial

Published2024-01-01

VenueMayo Clinic Proceedings

ISSN-L0025-6196

Languageen

Citations10

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.11.013

openalex_workW4390501564

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.