SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods proposed for monitoring the implementation of evidence-based research: a cross-sectional study
16 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
Methods proposed for monitoring the implementation of evidence-based research: a cross-sectional study (2024)Methods proposed for monitoring the imple…Is my study useless? Why researchers need methodological review boards (2023)Is my study useless? Why rese…Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews (2023)Definition, harms, and preven…Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials (2021)Barriers and Facilitating Fac…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Evidence synthesis and methodological research on evidence in medicine—Why it really is research and it really is medicine (2020)Evidence synthesis and method…The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)The use of systematic reviews…The use of systematic reviews to justify anaesthesiology trials: A meta‐epidemiological study (2018)The use of systematic reviews…Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe (2017)Acceptance of a systematic re…Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort (2015)Using systematic reviews to i…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials (2013)The use of systematic reviews…The problem of duplicate systematic reviews (2013)The problem of duplicate syst…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition (1986)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Reproducibility in Science (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis (2015)Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Are randomized controlled trials being conducted with the right justification? (2020)Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Digitalising the built environment for all generations: A new paradigm for equity and inclusive age-friendly cities and communities (2023)Meta-Research in Biomedical Investigation: Gaps and Opportunities Based on Meta-Research Publications and Global Indicators in Health, Science, and Human Development (2025)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review (2021)Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research (2022)Leiden manifesto and evidence-based research: Are the appropriate standards being used for the correct evaluation of pluralism, gaps and relevance in medical research? (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades (2024)The impact of investigator bias in nutrition research (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology208,861 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?146 cited
  • 2013The problem of duplicate systematic reviews99 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value94 cited
  • 2013The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials72 cited
  • 2023Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews34 cited
  • 2018The use of systematic reviews to justify anaesthesiology trials: A meta‐epidemiological study31 cited
  • 2017Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe31 cited
  • 2015Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort24 cited
  • 2021Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2023
Is my study useless? Why researchers need methodological review boards
16 cited
  • 2020Evidence synthesis and methodological research on evidence in medicine—Why it really is research and it really is medicine16 cited
  • 2019The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis15 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.