SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The challenge of assessing academic books: The U.K. and Lithuanian cases through the ISBN lens
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
The challenge of assessing academic books: The U.K. and Lithuanian cases through the ISBN lens (2024)The challenge of assessing academic books…Nine million book items and eleven million citations: a study of book-based scholarly communication using OpenCitations (2019)Nine million book items and e…More, Less or Better: The Problem of Evaluating Books in SSH Research (2018)More, Less or Better: The Pro…Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research (2017)Untangling Academic Publishin…Academic Books and their Future. A Report to the AHRC and the British Library (2017)Academic Books and their Futu…The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books (2016)The Complexity of Measuring t…Monographs and open access (2016)Monographs and open accessGlobal patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South (2016)Global patterns in the publis…Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs (2016)Data matching, integration, a…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Getting the word out: academic libraries as scholarly publishers (2015)Getting the word out: academi…Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history (2014)Can we rank scholarly book pu…Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening…Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications (2012)Accessibility, sustainability…Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences (2009)Libcitations: A measure for c…Research Library Publishing Services: New Options for University Publishing. (2008)Research Library Publishing S…Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics (2008)Library Catalog Analysis as a…Mapping scholarly books: library metadata and research assessment (2024)Mapping scholarly books: libr…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland (2016)Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries (2016)The visible hand of research performance assessment (2016)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Accounting for the effects of accountability. (1999)Scientific Utopia (2012)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities (2016)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension (2013)The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)Publishing Archaeological Excavations at the Digital Turn (2018)A probe into 66 factors which are possibly associated with the number of citations an article received (2019)The Democratisation Myth (2021)The End of History and the Last Man. (1992)Relocating Modern Science (2007)Provincializing Europe (2008)The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability (2018)The decolonial bandwagon and the dangers of intellectual decolonisation (2020)Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19 (2022)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities (2010)Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history (2013)The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Library Publishing as a New Model of Scholarly Communication (2009)From Service Providers to Content Producers: New Opportunities For Libraries in Collaborative Open Access Book Publishing (2010)Exploring How Library Publishing Services Facilitate Scholarly Communication (2011)How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice (2016)Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study (2016)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2016Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South476 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication368 cited
  • 2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited
  • 2012Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications147 cited
  • 2009Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences117 cited
  • 2008Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics89 cited
  • 2008Research Library Publishing Services: New Options for University Publishing.88 cited
  • 2014Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history87 cited
  • 2016Monographs and open access46 cited
  • 2015Getting the word out: academic libraries as scholarly publishers31 cited
  • 2016Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs27 cited
  • 2019Nine million book items and eleven million citations: a study of book-based scholarly communication using OpenCitations26 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books
25 cited
  • 2017Academic Books and their Future. A Report to the AHRC and the British Library18 cited
  • 2018More, Less or Better: The Problem of Evaluating Books in SSH Research14 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Mapping scholarly books: library metadata and research assessment6 cited