SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cardiology researchers’ practices and perceived barriers to open science: an international survey
10 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Cardiology researchers’ practices and perceived barriers to open science: an international survey (2024)Cardiology researchers’ practices and per…Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science (2017)Early-Career Researchers’ Per…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Reflections on the Irreproducibility of Scientific Papers (2015)Reflections on the Irreproduc…Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Outcome Discrepancies and Sel…Can’t Get No Reproduction (2015)Can’t Get No ReproductionReproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceTen Simple Rules for Cultivating Open Science and Collaborative R&D (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Cultivat…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation : a handbook of best practices (2007)Open science is a research accelerator (2011)Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software (2012)Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency (2014)Reproducibility in Research: Systems, Infrastructure, Culture (2017)Technological cooperation network in biotechnology (2018)Open access publishing takes off (2004)Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer Resources (2017)The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2020)Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Psychology of intergroup relations (1986)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)A Historically Based Review of Empirical Work on Color and Psychological Functioning: Content, Methods, and Recommendations for Future Research (2018)Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials (2018)Comparison of Clinical Trial Changes in Primary Outcome and Reported Intervention Effect Size Between Trial Registration and Publication (2019)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
  • 2015Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?80 cited
  • 2017Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science32 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Cultivating Open Science and Collaborative R&D31 cited
  • 2015Reflections on the Irreproducibility of Scientific Papers27 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of evidence26 cited
  • 2015Can’t Get No Reproduction11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work