SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance (2024)Librarians and information specialists as…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately (2020)Reporting guidelines of healt…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2019)Journal editors’ perspectives…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Impact of interventions to im…Case Study Research: Foundations and Methodological Orientations (2016)Case Study Research: Foundati…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for Reporting Quali…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2012)Correction: Improving the Qua…Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts (2024)Enhancing the quality and eff…Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison (2) (2004)Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison (2004)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (2011)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing (2017)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (2009)Sustainability Leadership in Higher Education Institutions: An Overview of Challenges (2020)Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas (2020)Promoting Rigorous Research by Examining Lived Experiences: A Review of Four Qualitative Traditions (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research13,012 cited
  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,506 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,744 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,422 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,343 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews4,191 cited
  • 2016Case Study Research: Foundations and Methodological Orientations1,016 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review804 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements599 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews338 cited
  • 2012Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)246 cited
  • 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 2020Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately100 cited
  • 2019Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study69 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts5 cited