SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Vegetation Classification and Survey is performing well
7 references·0 citing·20 second hop
Vegetation Classification and Survey is performing well (2024)Vegetation Classification and Survey is p…The benefits of publishing in society‐owned scientific journals (2023)The benefits of publishing in…Priorities in journal selection for authors, reviewers, editors, librarians and science funders (2023)Priorities in journal selecti…Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Journal citation reports and …Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (2021)Assessing the effect of artic…Vegetation classification goes open access (2020)Vegetation classification goe…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities (2018)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality (2022)Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south (2022)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)A comprehensive review of circular economy research in the textile and clothing industry (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing (2009)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)Why should early-career scientists publish in society journals (2023)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?1,147 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access1,028 cited
  • 2021Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)172 cited
  • 2021Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system124 cited
  • 2023The benefits of publishing in society‐owned scientific journals11 cited
  • 2020Vegetation classification goes open access8 cited
  • 2023Priorities in journal selection for authors, reviewers, editors, librarians and science funders5 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work