Examining the role of child welfare worker characteristics and the substantiation decision

Kristen Lwin · Alex Hoagland · Kofi Antwi-Boasiako · Peter MacKenzie · Barbara Fallon

10 citations0/0 files storedChild Abuse & Neglect

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Child Welfare and Adoption Social Work Education and Practice Child Abuse and Trauma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of child welfare workers is twofold, to promote the safety of children and youth and to address their wellbeing. This provincially legislated mandate requires child welfare workers to make decisions across the child welfare service continuum. After a report of child maltreatment is investigated, workers are required to assess the veracity of the allegation through the substantiation decision and to determine whether the child has been victimized, which may impact on families' future involvement with services. Little is known whether or how individual worker characteristics impact the substantiation decision. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This study estimated the degree of variation across caseworker characteristics in the substantiation decision through secondary data analysis of the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (OIS, 2018). We explored how the substantiation decision varied across clinical and caseworker characteristics, using both simple and multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: Findings suggest that primarily clinical characteristics predicted the substantiation decision, however, worker years of child welfare experience also predicted substantiation, such that more experienced workers were significantly more likely to substantiate than less experienced workers (est = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p < .10). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (35 %) suggests differences among child welfare workers' substantiation decision, they are however, characteristics not measured in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Further research to assess the differential nature of child welfare worker characteristics and their role in decision-making is required.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, income, and risk on the substantiation decision in child welfare 2008Longitudinal Analysis of Repeated Child Abuse Reporting and Victimization: Multistate Analysis of Associated Factors 2011Organizational climate, services, and outcomes in child welfare systems 2008The intersection of race, poverty and risk: understanding the decision to provide services to clients and to remove children.2019Child protective services decision-making: The role of children’s race and county factors.2013Individual and systemic/structural bias in child welfare decision making: Implications for children and families of color 2017Examining the Relationship between Economic Hardship and Child Maltreatment Using Data from the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect-2013 (OIS-2013)2017Factors associated with racial differences in child welfare investigative decision-making in Ontario, Canada

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.