SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Effectiveness of Digital Communication Media to Improve Adolescent Resilience Skills for Preventing Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review Protocol
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
The Effectiveness of Digital Communication Media to Improve Adolescent Resilience Skills for Preventing Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review Protocol (2024)The Effectiveness of Digital Communicatio…Mental Health Prevention and Promotion—A Narrative Review (2022)Mental Health Prevention and …Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents: an update of the recent literature and future directions (2021)Resilience and mental health …Digital Mental Health Challenges and the Horizon Ahead for Solutions (2021)Digital Mental Health Challen…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Conducting high quality scopi…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Practical Guidance for Knowle…Adolescence and mental health (2019)Adolescence and mental healthRayyan for systematic reviews (2018)Rayyan for systematic reviewsPRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta‐review (2016)Annual Research Review: Digit…Mental health literacy: Empowering the community to take action for better mental health. (2011)Mental health literacy: Empow…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How stigma interferes with mental health care. (2004)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature (2007)The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care (2014)The Global Burden of Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders: An Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (2015)Preventive strategies for mental health (2018)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. (2007)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Mental Health Mobile Apps for Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2017)Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Evidence on Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents and Young People: Systematic Overview (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Factor Structure of the 10-Item Perceived Stress Scale and Measurement Invariance Across Genders Among Chinese Adolescents (2020)The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being (2020)The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2011Mental health literacy: Empowering the community to take action for better mental health.1,779 cited
  • 2016Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta‐review840 cited
  • 2019Adolescence and mental health670 cited
  • 2019Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods373 cited
  • 2021Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents: an update of the recent literature and future directions342 cited
  • 2020Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions305 cited
  • 2018Rayyan for systematic reviews254 cited
  • 2022Mental Health Prevention and Promotion—A Narrative Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

254 cited
  • 2021Digital Mental Health Challenges and the Horizon Ahead for Solutions173 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.