The role of Whistleblowing as a mechanism to prevent state capture: A case from the global south

Abstract

State capture is a highly problematic phenomenon, with it entailing collusion practices between state functionaries and private individuals to repurpose the state for their own gain. It creeps up in vulnerable states, those that are developing or are undergoing a transition. When it manifests, it drives those vulnerable states to fragility, turning them into vehicles for predation with severely negative consequences for the state's citizens. South Africa was plagued by state capture whilst under the leadership of Jacob Zuma (2009-2018). State-owned enterprises were looted, government contracts were manipulated, and structures intended to serve the public good were abused at the behest of the wrongdoers. This came to the fore because of the disclosures of whistleblowers, who reported the wrongdoing to parties that were able to effect action. They exposed a complex system of collusion, highlighting to the South African public how comprised the state had become. Their actions ultimately led to the removal of Jacob Zuma as president of South Africa, leading to the re-democratization of South Africa. The subject of this paper is, thus, concerned with the role the South African whistleblowers played in combating state capture. Ultimately, this paper's goal is to present an argument that whistleblowing has the capacity to curb, and even prevent, state capture. However, it must also be added that when promoting the use of whistleblowing as an ethical check, adequate legislative protection for whistleblowers needs to exist, as does the cooperation of the state and civil society when supporting whistleblowers.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.