SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Qualitative Study Assessing the Management of Predatory Journals and Their Publishing Activities: Results From the ASGLOS Study
14 references·0 citing·41 second hop
A Qualitative Study Assessing the Management of Predatory Journals and Their Publishing Activities: Results From the ASGLOS Study (2024)A Qualitative Study Assessing the Managem…The ASGLOS Study: A global survey on how predatory journals affect scientific practice (2023)The ASGLOS Study: A global su…Rebranding of Predatory Journals and Conferences: Understanding Its Implication and Prevention Strategy (2023)Rebranding of Predatory Journ…Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness (2021)Delphi methodology in healthc…Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews (2021)Dealing with predatory journa…Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Predatory Journals: What They…One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)One size fits all? What count…Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Reflecting on reflexive thema…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts (2019)Predatory journals and confer…Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey (2018)Predatory journals and dubiou…Spamming in scholarly publishing: A case study (2015)Spamming in scholarly publish…Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences (2014)Predatory Publishing, Questio…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (1998)Thematic analysis. (2012)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)Thematic Analysis (2022)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project (2020)Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions (2020)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Predatory Journals: What the Researchers and Authors Should Know (2024)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward (2021)Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review (2024)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017)Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review (2022)Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study (2024)The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies in surgery (2024)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2019Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis19,565 cited
  • 2020One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?9,627 cited
  • 2021Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness1,809 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2020Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them190 cited
  • 2014Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences126 cited
  • 2021Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews71 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts42 cited
  • 2015Spamming in scholarly publishing: A case study35 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey12 cited
  • 2023Rebranding of Predatory Journals and Conferences: Understanding Its Implication and Prevention Strategy10 cited
  • 2023The ASGLOS Study: A global survey on how predatory journals affect scientific practice8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work