Test–retest reliability and reliable change index of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition digital test battery

Laura Klaming · Mandy Spaltman · Stefan Vermeent · Gijs van Elswijk · Justin B. Miller · Ben A. Schmand

1 citations0/0 files storedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article provides the test-retest reliability and Reliable Change Indices (RCIs) of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition (ISC) platform, which contains digitized versions of well-established neuropsychological tests. METHOD: 147 participants (ages 19 to 88) completed a digital cognitive test battery on the ISC platform or paper-pencil versions of the same test battery during two separate visits. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated separately for the ISC and analog test versions to compare reliabilities between administration modalities. RCIs were calculated for the digital tests using the practice-adjusted RCI and standardized regression-based (SRB) method. RESULTS: Test-retest reliabilities for the ISC tests ranged from moderate to excellent and were comparable to the test-retest reliabilities for the paper-pencil tests. Baseline test performance, retest interval, age, and education predicted test performance at visit 2 with baseline test performance being the strongest predictor for all outcome measures. For most outcome measures, both methods for the calculation of RCIs show agreement on whether or not a reliable change was observed. CONCLUSIONS: RCIs for the digital tests enable clinicians to determine whether a measured change between assessments is due to real improvement or decline. Together, this contributes to the growing evidence for the clinical utility of the ISC platform.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

References

2016A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research 1991Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.2013Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox 2004Neuropsychological assessment.2006Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs 2010Financial Exploitation and Psychological Mistreatment Among Older Adults: Differences Between African Americans and Non-African Americans in a Population-Based Survey 2012Scoring Higher the Second Time Around: Meta-Analyses of Practice Effects in Neuropsychological Assessment 2016Stability in Test-Usage Practices of Clinical Neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada Over a 10-Year Period: A Follow-Up Survey of INS and NAN Members

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.