SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Enhancing the horizon scanning utility of futures-oriented systematic and scoping reviews
16 references·0 citing·28 second hop
Enhancing the horizon scanning utility of futures-oriented systematic and scoping reviews (2024)Enhancing the horizon scanning utility of…Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements (2021)Preparing, conducting, and an…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…The Systematic Review (2014)The Systematic ReviewA scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review (2011)'Scoping the scope' of a coch…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (2009)The SAGE handbook of organiza…Producing a systematic review. (2009)Producing a systematic review.A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…WHY “WHAT WORKS” WON’T WORK: EVIDENCE‐BASED PRACTICE AND THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (2007)WHY “WHAT WORKS” WON’T WORK: …How to Write a Systematic Review (2007)How to Write a Systematic Rev…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Sample Size Requirements for Estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman Correlations (2000)Sample Size Requirements for …The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow (2013)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2009The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods2,127 cited
  • 2009Producing a systematic review.2,063 cited
  • 2007WHY “WHAT WORKS” WON’T WORK: EVIDENCE‐BASED PRACTICE AND THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH1,650 cited
  • 2011'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review1,259 cited
  • 2000Sample Size Requirements for Estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman Correlations1,090 cited
  • 2021Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements640 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
How to Write a Systematic Review
606 cited
  • 2014The Systematic Review598 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.