SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Misleading presentations in functional food trials led by contract research organizations were frequently observed in Japan: meta-epidemiological study
9 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Misleading presentations in functional food trials led by contract research organizations were frequently observed in Japan: meta-epidemiological study (2024)Misleading presentations in functional fo…A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Positive Results in Clinical Nutrition Research: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Statistically Significant Findings (2022)A Meta-Epidemiological Study …Compliance of Clinical Trial Protocols for Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Consistency between Clinical Trial Registrations and Published Reports (2021)Compliance of Clinical Trial …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency (2019)Quality of Systematic Reviews…Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions (2019)Evaluation of Journal Registr…Effect of Heat-Killed Lactobacillus paracasei KW3110 Ingestion on Ocular Disorders Caused by Visual Display Terminal (VDT) Loads: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Group Study (2018)Effect of Heat-Killed Lactoba…Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)Update on Trial Registration …Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider (2018)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)Work with video display terminals among office employees. I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. (1985)Work Related Risk Factors for Neck, Shoulder and Arms Complaints: A Cohort Study Among Dutch Computer Office Workers (2009)Blink Rate, Incomplete Blinks and Computer Vision Syndrome (2013)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study (2020)Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses (2023)Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2 (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,975 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes833 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research516 cited
  • 2017Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established250 cited
  • 2018Effect of Heat-Killed Lactobacillus paracasei KW3110 Ingestion on Ocular Disorders Caused by Visual Display Terminal (VDT) Loads: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Group Study47 cited
  • 2019Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions34 cited
  • 2019Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency31 cited
  • 2021Compliance of Clinical Trial Protocols for Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Consistency between Clinical Trial Registrations and Published Reports9 cited
  • 2022A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Positive Results in Clinical Nutrition Research: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Statistically Significant Findings8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work