SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress
7 references·2 citing·33 second hop
Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress (2024)Trends in US public confidence in science…The Trust Fallacy (2021)The Trust FallacyCoronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Coronavirus conspiracy suspic…Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Reproducibility and Replicabi…Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (2017)The Oxford Handbook of the Sc…FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…Fostering Integrity in Research (2016)Fostering Integrity in Resear…The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it (2025)The rising danger of AI-gener…From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science (2024)From complexity to clarity: H…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Signaling the trustworthiness of science (2019)Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI (2024)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (2007)Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants (2015)Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA (2021)A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy (2022)Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review (2022)Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review (2022)The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods (2009)Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (2009)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Ideation with Generative AI—in Consumer Research and Beyond (2025)Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct (2024)Attitudes and Attitude Change (2017)Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition (2017)A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020)Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)The chronic growing pains of communicating science online (2022)Thirty years of science–society interfaces: What’s next? (2022)Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication (2025)Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale” (2018)Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Reproducibility and Replicability in Science921 cited
  • 2017The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication525 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication390 cited
  • 2021Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic301 cited
  • 2016Fostering Integrity in Research186 cited
  • 2017FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH135 cited
  • 2021The Trust Fallacy35 cited

Cited by

  • 2024From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science48 cited
  • 2025The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work