What We Really Value: Redefining Scholarly Engagement in Tenure and Promotion Protocols

Susan H. Delagrange · Mike Palmquist · Michael A. Pemberton · Janice R. Walker

25 citations0/0 files storedCollege Composition and Communication

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication University Challenges and Reforms Mentoring and Academic Development

Abstract

This article argues that tenure and promotion decisions should reflect the fundamental ways in which the academy and our positions within it have changed. Calling attention to the role senior scholars can play, the article considers the challenges offered by activity in four areas: digital and new-media scholarship, editorial and curatorial work, administration and leadership, and mentoring.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.