SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Digital competence and information literacy: clarifying concepts based on a literature review
2 references·3 citing·23 second hop
Digital competence and information literacy: clarifying concepts based on a literature review (2023)Digital competence and information litera…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…The role of libraries in teaching doctoral students to become information-literate researchers (2018)The role of libraries in teac…Assessment of pharmacy students’ engagement in using national e-learning resources: a study from a public university in Saudi Arabia (2026)Assessment of pharmacy studen…Competencias informacionales en la formación inicial docente: una revisión sistemática de la literatura (2025)Competencias informacionales …Bridging the digital divide: development and validation of a digital literacy scale for older adults in China (2025)Bridging the digital divide: …Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts (2001)Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies (2010)Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education (2013)What every researcher should know about searching – clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia (2020)A qualitative investigation of the digital literacy practices of doctoral students (2021)A scoping review of digital literacy, digital competence, digital fluency and digital dexterity in academic libraries' context (2025)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)Developing the information literacy self‐efficacy scale (2006)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Competencias informacionales en la formación inicial docente: creencias, motivaciones y aptitudes (2026)Competencias informacionales en la formación inicial docente: una propuesta para su observación (2026)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2014)Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well‐being: Evidence from three large datasets (2020)Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Online Learning During the COVID-19 Lockdown (2021)The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines11,435 cited
  • 2018The role of libraries in teaching doctoral students to become information-literate researchers41 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Bridging the digital divide: development and validation of a digital literacy scale for older adults in China10 cited
  • 2025Competencias informacionales en la formación inicial docente: una revisión sistemática de la literatura3 cited
  • 2026Assessment of pharmacy students’ engagement in using national e-learning resources: a study from a public university in Saudi Arabia1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work