The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, Panopticism, and the Rhetoric of Academic

Sean Zwagerman

56 citations0/0 files storedCollege Composition and Communication

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Rhetoric and Communication Studies Discourse Analysis in Language Studies

Abstract

This article is a rhetorical analysis of the anxious and outraged discourse employed in response to the “rising tide” of cheating and plagiarism. This discourse invites actions that are antithetical to the goals of education and the roles of educators, as exemplified by the proliferation of plagiarism-detection technologies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern, and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning 2015Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning 2016Student Perspectives on Plagiarism 2013Academic staff's perspectives upon student plagiarism: a case study at a university in Hong Kong 2019Plagiarism or not? investigation of Turnitin®‐detected similarity hits in biology laboratory reports 2010Students Turned Off by Turnitin? Perception of Plagiarism and Collusion by Undergraduate Bioscience Students 2015Student Perspectives on Plagiarism 2018Academic Integrity from China to the United States: The Acculturation Process for Chinese Graduate Students in the United States

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.