Development of craquelure patterns in paintings on panels

Abstract

Abstract Panel paintings are multi-layer structures composed of humidity-sensitive materials. Preventing or limiting stresses in these structures, generated by the loss or gain of moisture, requires an understanding of the relevant processes and risks. A three-dimensional elastic model of a panel painting was used to analyse surface stresses and understand how crack patterns are developed in the two-layer structure of the pictorial layer—the gesso and the paints. Two historically important paint types were considered—egg tempera and oil paints, laid on a gesso produced following historical procedures. Two scenarios of stress development were analysed: permanent cumulative drying shrinkage of paints or gesso, owing to gradual loss of water or evolution of the molecular composition of the binders, and moisture-induced cyclic swelling of the wood substrate. Ratios of distances between cracks in the tangential and longitudinal directions of a wood panel to the layer thickness were estimated for increasing magnitudes of materials’ dimensional change in the two scenarios. The critical values of the ratios for which stress in the midpoint between the cracks dropped below the value inducing strain at break in the materials and saturation of the crack patterns occurred, was approximately 3–4 or 5–6 for the paints and the gesso, respectively . The critical distance normalized to the gesso thickness between cracks parallel to the wood grain induced by cyclic swelling of the wood substrate due to relative humidity variation in the range of 50–70% was 6. The study demonstrated that crack spacings in the fully developed crack systems remain sensitive only to the thicknesses of paint or gesso layers which, therefore, can be derived from the crack pattern geometry. Existing flaws in gesso were found not to increase the risk of new crack development.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.