SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Persons with Disabilities in the Christian Church: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Expressions of Compassion and Justice on their Inclusion and Participation
16 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Persons with Disabilities in the Christian Church: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Expressions of Compassion and Justice on their Inclusion and Participation (2024)Persons with Disabilities in the Christia…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)One size fits all? What count…Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Reflecting on reflexive thema…Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)Best practice guidelines for …Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Models of disability: A brief overview (2018)Models of disability: A brief…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a com…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Diagnostic and Statistical Ma…Beyond PICO (2012)Beyond PICOScoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research (2010)Presenting and Evaluating Qua…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (1998)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Thematic analysis. (2012)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)Thematic Analysis (2022)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation (1988)The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories (1995)The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders116,254 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2019Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis21,320 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2020One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?10,782 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,574 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,124 cited
  • 2014PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews2,840 cited
  • 2012Beyond PICO2,676 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,904 cited
  • 2010Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research1,193 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
431 cited
  • 2018Models of disability: A brief overview405 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.