A Second Apostate?

İlhami Tekin Cinemre

2 citations0/0 files storedIran and the Caucasus

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Byzantine Studies and History Classical Antiquity Studies Biblical Studies and Interpretation

Abstract

Abstract The epithet apostate is one of the most striking terms among symbolic characters of late antiquity. It has been applied to only Iulianus and described his paganist practices. Yet, there is another character from the same era that modern literature has left in the dark. After just seven years of Iulianus’ death, Pap, the Armenian king, was labelled as impious by Armenian sources like the characterization of Iulianus by Roman Christians. Keeping these under consideration, this study aims to re-examine whether Pap could be named as a second apostate and to conclude that this was a unilateral glance.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1968The Cambridge History of Iran 1972Zurvan: A Zoroastrian Dilemma 1983THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF IRAN UNDER THE SASANIANS 1997The Armenian people from ancient to modern times 1995Georgia in Antiquity: A History of Colchis and Transcaucasian Iberia, 550 B.C.-A.D. 562 1965Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire 1904Die altarmenischen Ortsnamen 2016Armenia Christiana: Armenian Religious Identity and the Churches of Constantinople and Rome (4th–15th Century)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.