SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
0 references·7 citing·28 second hop
ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature (2024)ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the p…Where there’s a will there’s a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited (2025)Where there’s a will there’s …The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the External Review of Scientific Manuscripts and Editorial Peer Review Processes (2024)The Impact of Generative Arti…The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Content Synthesis for Authors (2024)The Impact of Generative Arti…The artificial intelligence revolution...in unethical publishing: Will AI worsen our dysfunctional publishing system? (2024)The artificial intelligence r…Philosophical, Legal, Ethical, and Practical Considerations in the Emerging Use of Generative AI in Academic Journals: Guidelines for Research in Science Education (RISE) (2024)Philosophical, Legal, Ethical…Examining uncertainty in journal peer reviewers’ recommendations: a cross-sectional study (2024)Examining uncertainty in jour…‘ AI ‐navigating’ or ‘ AI ‐sinking’? An analysis of verbs in research articles titles suspicious of containing AI ‐generated/assisted content (2024)‘ AI ‐navigating’ or ‘ AI ‐si…‘Tortured phrases’ give away fabricated research papers (2021)Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Research Integrity in Scholarly Publishing (2024)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer review (2021)ChatGPT is bullshit (2024)Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study (2026)Reassembling the Social (2005)Meeting the Universe Halfway (2007)Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities (2006)How Professors Think (2009)Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis (2026)Taxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models (2022)Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress (2024)Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025)The diffusion of large language models in published academic articles (2026)The rise of large language models and the direction and impact of US federal research funding (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2024Philosophical, Legal, Ethical, and Practical Considerations in the Emerging Use of Generative AI in Academic Journals: Guidelines for Research in Science Education (RISE)22 cited
  • 2024The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Content Synthesis for Authors17 cited
  • 2024The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the External Review of Scientific Manuscripts and Editorial Peer Review Processes16 cited
  • 2024The artificial intelligence revolution...in unethical publishing: Will AI worsen our dysfunctional publishing system?14 cited
  • 2024‘ AI ‐navigating’ or ‘ AI ‐sinking’? An analysis of verbs in research articles titles suspicious of containing AI ‐generated/assisted content9 cited
  • 2025Where there’s a will there’s a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited7 cited
  • 2024Examining uncertainty in journal peer reviewers’ recommendations: a cross-sectional study7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work