SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams
16 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams (2024)Guidance for systematic reviews in journa…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Synthesis without meta-analys…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for…Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Guidance on Conducting a Syst…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review (2003)Five Steps to Conducting a Sy…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications (2018)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,561 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 2017Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review3,449 cited
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,196 cited
  • 2003Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review1,872 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument901 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.