SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trial sequential analysis: A simple guide for judging the conclusiveness of the effect
11 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Trial sequential analysis: A simple guide for judging the conclusiveness of the effect (2024)Trial sequential analysis: A simple guide…Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review (2023)Proposed triggers for retirin…Explanation of trial sequential analysis: using a post-hoc analysis of meta-analyses published in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (2021)Explanation of trial sequenti…False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review (2016)False-positive findings in Co…Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Thresholds for statistical an…The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)The Impact of Study Size on M…The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study (2011)The Number of Patients and Ev…Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects (2011)Statistically significant met…Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias (2009)Updating meta-analyses leads …Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)Trial sequential analysis rev…Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2008)Can trial sequential monitori…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasMeta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (2010)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews (2017)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis (2018)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2020)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review (2023)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias7,306 cited
  • 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
  • 2008Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?834 cited
  • 2014Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods704 cited
  • 2013The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews672 cited
  • 2011The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study320 cited
  • 2016False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review279 cited
  • 2011Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects160 cited
  • 2009Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias104 cited
  • 2021Explanation of trial sequential analysis: using a post-hoc analysis of meta-analyses published in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology44 cited
  • 2023Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work