SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources
11 references·1 citing·30 second hop
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources (2024)Large scoping reviews: managing volume an…What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis (2022)What are scoping reviews? Pro…Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Recommendations for the extra…Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group (2022)Moving from consultation to c…Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Best practice guidance and re…Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses (2021)Guidance for using artificial…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Conducting high quality scopi…A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research (2019)A scoping review describes me…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews (2016)An Evidence‐Based Approach to…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Scoping reviews vis-à-vis systematic reviews and integrative reviews in management research: guidelines for good practice (2025)Scoping reviews vis-à-vis sys…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol (2021)Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Using PROGRESS-plus to identify current approaches to the collection and reporting of equity-relevant data: a scoping review (2023)ABC of a Scoping Review: A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline (2024)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions (2023)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Scoping Review (2023)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review (2021)Methodological Issues in Rehabilitation Research: A Scoping Review (2021)The potential of food environment policies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diets and to improve healthy diets among lower socioeconomic groups: an umbrella review (2022)Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review (2023)“How-to”: scoping review? (2024)Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol (2025)Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users (2023)Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities (2025)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2022Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews1,972 cited
  • 2022Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols1,438 cited
  • 2022What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis761 cited
  • 2016An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews654 cited
  • 2020Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions305 cited
  • 2019A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research198 cited
  • 2022Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group187 cited
  • 2021Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses104 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Scoping reviews vis-à-vis systematic reviews and integrative reviews in management research: guidelines for good practice20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work