SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A systematic literature review across domains
16 references·0 citing·55 second hop
Ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A systematic literature review across domains (2024)Ordering effects in discrete choice exper…Successful combination of database search and snowballing for identification of primary studies in systematic literature studies (2022)Successful combination of dat…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them (2020)Eight problems with literatur…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Contemporary Guidance for Sta…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias in the socia…Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments (2012)Truth in Consequentiality: Th…Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice (2012)Shining in the Center: Centra…How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load (2006)How do respondents process st…Beyond Publication Bias (2005)Beyond Publication BiasAssessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates (2004)Assessing the influence of de…The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching (2001)The Influence of Task Complex…Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? (2001)Do Hypothetical and Actual Ma…An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement (1987)An Evaluation of a Cognitive …Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data (1983)Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving (1990)Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation (2005)Incentive and informational properties of preference questions (2007)Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature (2010)META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS: A QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF LITERATURE SURVEYS (1989)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies (2008)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Promoting an open research culture (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993)Stated choice methods analysis and applications (2000)Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study (2007)Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions (2009)The nature of human values (1973)Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. (1980)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys (1991)Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality (2005)Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies (2012)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The Contact Hypothesis Revisited (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Developing a Questionnaire (2015)Contingent Valuation in Practice (2017)Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in Small Island Developing States (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review (2022)Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review (2023)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews12,012 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,092 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2017Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies1,554 cited
  • 2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,549 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,393 cited
  • 1987An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement854 cited
  • 2005Beyond Publication Bias745 cited
  • 2004Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates571 cited
  • 2001Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?550 cited
  • 2001The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching528 cited
  • 2022Successful combination of database search and snowballing for identification of primary studies in systematic literature studies471 cited
  • 2006How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load418 cited
  • 2012Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

378 cited
  • 2012Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice326 cited
  • 2020Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them313 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.