Embracing throwntogetherness: Unravelling the relational dynamics of borderlands in divided cities

Abstract

This research delves into the relational character of borderlands examining the nuanced concept of throwntogetherness within contested cities. Whilst prevailing literature often characterises walls and borders as static entities, this study proposes a paradigm shift, advocating for the recognition of borderlands as complex and relational networks. Using a mixed-method research approach, the study examines the profound ramifications of divisions, addresses socio-spatial imbalances, and hidden interconnected human experiences within divided landscapes. Through a comprehensive analysis of the city of Belfast, this research uncovers three interrelated patterns that reflect the spectrum of in-betweenness within interface areas encompassing separation, openness, and seclusion. These patterns extend beyond local geography, revealing broader socio-spatial phenomena. The findings highlight interfaces as junctions of both connection and division, prompting inquiries into effective urban planning and design strategies that foster meaningful relationships and cohesive urban dynamics. By dissecting socio-spatial dynamics that exist in these contested environments, this research unveils the array of tensions and synergies embedded in throwntogetherness, intricately woven into the urban fabric of divided cities. • This research challenges the static view of borderlands and advocates for seeing them as relational spaces. • Three interrelated patterns of in-betweenness are identified —separation, openness, and seclusion— revealing the complexities of divided urban areas. • The findings raise questions about urban planning strategies to promote meaningful relationships and cohesion in bordering regions. • This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding border areas and offers insights into cultivating coexistence within such environments

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.