ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНЕ ТА ЕТИЧНЕ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ДОСЛІДНИЦЬКІЙ І ПУБЛІКАЦІЙНІЙ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually gaining a stable place in our lives, and its use is spreading too quickly in all areas of activity, changing approaches and simplifying the solution of some tasks. AI can help at certain stages of scientific research, but it also poses risks of plagiarism, lack of academic integrity and high ethical standards. The problem of plagiarism and its prevention in the research and publication process has reached a high degree of relevance, especially with the use of AI programs and services. The article presents a comprehensive analysis of scientific sources covering the prevention of plagiarism in scientific publications, the development of AI in research culture, the observance of academic integrity in the university environment, and changes in the assessment of students' academic achievements..Using the GoogleTrends service, based on the search engine's statistical data, it was determined that recently, scientific topics related to ChatGPT have been dominating in the queries of Internet users, while the discourse related to plagiarism, academic integrity, research ethics, and responsible use of AI is not noticeably relevant, and there is an increase in related queries between "plagiarism" and AI tools. The authors substantiate the impact of the use of AI on the responsible attitude to the presentation of research results. After processing the downloaded data in Excel, a hypothesis is formulated regarding the convergence of interests and joint consideration of the problems of ethics in research and responsible use of AI. The analysed data demonstrate that the relevance of ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scientific manuscripts is extremely high. The article demonstrates how digital tools such as Connected Papers, Inciteful, LitMaps, Scite.Ai, ResearchRabbit, and Semantic Scholar can conveniently visualise documents related to search terms. The article offers recommendations for researchers and editorial board members of scientific journals to promote responsible presentation of research findings in the context of the growing availability and use of AI.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.