SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Recognising the importance and impact of Imaging Scientists: Global guidelines for establishing career paths within core facilities
3 references·1 citing·21 second hop
Recognising the importance and impact of Imaging Scientists: Global guidelines for establishing career paths within core facilities (2024)Recognising the importance and impact of …Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Academic criteria for promoti…Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study (2018)Building a Sustainable Portfo…Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes (2016)Metrics for Success: Strategi…Making the most of bioimaging data through interdisciplinary interactions (2024)Making the most of bioimaging…The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance (1992)The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. (1992)The national labs: science in an American system, 1947-1974 (2003)What is the structure of our infrastructure? A review of UK light microscopy facilities (2021)Navigating the frontier: research infrastructures, core facilities and a new paradigm at European Universities (2024)Staying on track – Keeping things running in a high‐end scientific imaging core facility (2024)Authorship: why not just toss a coin? (2008)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Institutional core facilities: prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences (2016)Shared instrumentation facilities: Benefiting researchers and universities, and sustaining research excellence (2020)Organizing core facilities as force multipliers: strategies for research universities (2021)More than just ‘added value’: The perils of not establishing shared core facilities in resource‐constrained communities (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods (2020)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)A “datathon” model to support cross-disciplinary collaboration (2016)A Novel Paradigm for Expert Core Facility Staff Training (2020)Meeting in the Middle: Towards Successful Multidisciplinary Bioimage Analysis Collaboration (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities241 cited
  • 2018Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study42 cited
  • 2016Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes38 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Making the most of bioimaging data through interdisciplinary interactions9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work