SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science
9 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science (2024)Inconclusive decisions and error rates in…Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons (2023)Validity of forensic cartridg…Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives (2022)Inconclusives, Errors, and Er…Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach (2021)Inconclusives and error rates…Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies (2021)Forensic science and the prin…Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions (2020)Treatment of inconclusives in…(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)(Mis)use of scientific measur…“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide (2018)“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Lin…Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)Repeatability and Reproducibi…Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Accuracy and reliability of f…Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons (2024)Methodological problems in ev…What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? (1991)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts (2015)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives (1981)Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments (1989)A hierarchy of expert performance. (2016)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (1990)Being and nothingness : a phenomenological essay on ontology (1992)Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. (1993)A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach (2019)ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work (2019)The logic of scientific discovery (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science (2021)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (2004)Foundations of Decision Analysis (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)The scientific reinvention of forensic science (2023)Blinding as a Solution to Bias : Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law (2016)The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity (2017)Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners (2022)Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results (1987)The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations (2004)Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results (2013)Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence (2023)Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias (2020)The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency (2023)The ‘elasticity’ of criminal evidence: a moderator of investigator bias (2008)Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods (2023)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Design and Analysis of Experiments (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
  • 2012Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners180 cited
  • 2020(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science83 cited
  • 2018“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide74 cited
  • 2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies38 cited
  • 2020Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions36 cited
  • 2021Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach36 cited
  • 2022Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives30 cited
  • 2023Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons24 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work