SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years
16 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years (2024)Biomedical retractions due to misconduct …Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Retracted papers originating …Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions (2019)Research misconduct in health…Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)Misconduct as the main cause …FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations (2014)The ethics of scholarly publi…Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions (2014)Research Misconduct Definitio…Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Heterogeneity in European Res…Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)Retractions in the research l…Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative (2025)Scientometric indicators in r…Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends (2024)Global retractions due to ran…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Human Error (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking (2011)Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions (2022)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Publish or impoverish (2017)Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)The landscape of biomedical research (2024)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Bonus Culture: Competitive Pay, Screening, and Multitasking (2016)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?161 cited
  • 2022Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study156 cited
  • 2018Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors140 cited
  • 2017FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH135 cited
  • 2014Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions123 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations
107 cited
  • 2019Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions85 cited
  • 2014Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance73 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends28 cited
    • 2025Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative14 cited