References

• 2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
• 2014On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect98 cited
• 2013The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.90 cited
• 2015Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.75 cited
• 2010Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals63 cited
• 2023Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence62 cited
• 2005Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random‐Match Probability62 cited
• 2016Model forensic science60 cited
• 2016Science, technology, or the expert witness: What influences jurors’ judgments about forensic science testimony?51 cited
• 2019Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices49 cited
• 2017Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact39 cited
• 2013How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment37 cited
• 1994Check Your Crystal Ball at the Courthouse Door, Please: Exploring the Past, Understanding the Present, and Worrying About the Future of Scientific Evidence