SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Generative artificial intelligence is infiltrating peer review process
1 references·6 citing·25 second hop
Generative artificial intelligence is infiltrating peer review process (2024)Generative artificial intelligence is inf…Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study (2024)Exploring the potential of Ch…Peer review in the age of artificial intelligence: a comparative study of human and AI-generated review reports (2026)Peer review in the age of art…Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)Artificial intelligence in sc…When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)When and how to disclose AI u…The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research (2025)The Paradox of Ethical AI-Ass…Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study (2025)Personal experience with AI-g…Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language models: A critical stocktaking of challenges, red flags, and recommendations (2025)Ensuring peer review integrit…A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. (2023)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions (2024)Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey (2025)Bias in peer review (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)A large-scale randomized study of large language model feedback in peer review (2026)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool (2024)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)The Presence and Nature of AI-Use Disclosure Statements in Medical Education Journals: A Bibliometric Study (2026)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor (2023)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study78 cited

Cited by

  • 2025When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.19236 cited
  • 2025Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language models: A critical stocktaking of challenges, red flags, and recommendations18 cited
  • 2025The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research17 cited
  • 2025Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study15 cited
  • 2026Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges13 cited
  • 2026Peer review in the age of artificial intelligence: a comparative study of human and AI-generated review reports8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work