SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The misuse of the nonlinear field normalization method: Nonlinear field normalization citation counts at the paper level should not be added or averaged
16 references·0 citing·41 second hopsampled
The misuse of the nonlinear field normalization method: Nonlinear field normalization citation counts at the paper level should not be added or averaged (2024)The misuse of the nonlinear field normali…Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations (2019)Female citation impact superi…Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields (2019)Academic collaboration rates …Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation (2017)Three practical field normali…Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 (2017)Critical remarks on the Itali…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories (2014)Comparison of the effect of m…The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields (2013)The Measurement of the Effect…A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)A systematic empirical compar…A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions (2012)A Reverse Engineering Approac…Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Towards a new crown indicator…Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations (2010)Scopus's source normalized im…Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS (2010)Remaining problems with the “…Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Universality of citation dist…Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor (2008)Modifying the journal impact …Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-…Programmatic evaluation and comparison based on standardized citation scores (1983)Programmatic evaluation and c…A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science (2012)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The skewness of science (1992)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Universality of scholarly impact metrics (2013)The skewness of scientific productivity (2014)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network (2017)Hidden Curriculum and Character Building on Self-Motivation based on K-means Clustering (2018)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Science of science (2018)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (2019)Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review (2020)MEASURING SOCIETAL IMPACTS OF RESEARCH WITH ALTMETRICS? COMMON PROBLEMS AND MISTAKES (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics (1976)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level507 cited
  • 2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations442 cited
  • 2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
  • 2008Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor180 cited
  • 2010Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations159 cited
  • 2013A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators149 cited
  • 2012A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions96 cited
  • 2017Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation96 cited
  • 2014Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories72 cited
  • 1983Programmatic evaluation and comparison based on standardized citation scores62 cited
  • 2017Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–201455 cited
  • 2010Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS53 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013
The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields
52 cited
  • 2019Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations50 cited
  • 2019Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields50 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.