SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Towards setting a standard for evaluating living labs with case studies in Turkiye
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Towards setting a standard for evaluating living labs with case studies in Turkiye (2024)Towards setting a standard for evaluating…Living labs: Challenging and changing the smart city power relations? (2022)Living labs: Challenging and …Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective (2021)Designing and implementing da…Urban Living Labs: Towards an Integrated Understanding of their Key Components (2019)Urban Living Labs: Towards an…Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? (2018)Urban living laboratories: Co…A systematic review of living lab literature (2018)A systematic review of living…Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities (2017)Towards Third-Generation Livi…Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions (2016)Urban living labs: governing …Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda (2015)Urban living labs for sustain…Living labs: concepts, tools and cases (2015)Living labs: concepts, tools …Living Labs: a systematic literature review (2015)Living Labs: a systematic lit…Designing social living labs in urban research (2015)Designing social living labs …Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms (2015)Cities as Collaborative Innov…Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? (2013)Actor Roles in an Urban Livin…Thematic analysis. (2012)Thematic analysis.Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs (2011)Managing the Challenges of Be…Why Action Research? (2003)Why Action Research?Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes (2026)Living labs: a systematic rev…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching (1986)Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform (1987)Participatory action research: contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education (2009)The Field Site as a Network: A Strategy for Locating Ethnographic Research (2009)The Social Ecology of Resilience (2011)The Location of Culture (2012)Science as practice and culture (1992)Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda (2007)Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space (2015)Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation (2019)Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation (2021)Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward (2021)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks (2012)Environmental innovation, knowledge spillovers and policy implications: A systematic review of the economic effects literature (2019)A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success (2022)Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems (2006)Urban Living Lab as a Circular Economy Ecosystem: Advancing Environmental Sustainability through Economic Value, Material, and Knowledge Flows (2021)Co-Cities (2022)Co-Creation for Sustainability (2022)Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review (2008)Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies (2012)The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs (2018)Technology Innovation Management Review (2012)Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience (2017)Living Labs and user engagement for innovation and sustainability (2020)Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs (2018)Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation (2018)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)Thematic Analysis (2022)Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship (2016)Systemic innovation labs: a lab for wicked problems (2018)Living labs: From scattered initiatives to a global movement (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Thematic analysis.9,891 cited
  • 2003Why Action Research?1,033 cited
  • 2015Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda749 cited
  • 2018A systematic review of living lab literature582 cited
  • 2016Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions524 cited
  • 2018Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city?286 cited
  • 2011Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs247 cited
  • 2015Living labs: concepts, tools and cases176 cited
  • 2013Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland?119 cited
  • 2019Urban Living Labs: Towards an Integrated Understanding of their Key Components107 cited
  • 2015Designing social living labs in urban research104 cited
  • 2017Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities97 cited
  • 2021Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective76 cited
  • 2022Living labs: Challenging and changing the smart city power relations?75 cited
  • 2015Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms71 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
Living Labs: a systematic literature review
68 cited

Cited by

  • 2026Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes5 cited