SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review
15 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review (2024)Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearab…Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health (2020)Understanding the global meas…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: Health-Economic Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial (2020)Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual…Overview of Cost-effectiveness Analysis (2019)Overview of Cost-effectivenes…Choosing a Time Horizon in Cost and Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2019)Choosing a Time Horizon in Co…When is it too expensive? Cost-effectiveness thresholds and health care decision-making (2018)When is it too expensive? Cos…Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future (2018)Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds…The influence of time horizon on results of cost-effectiveness analyses (2017)The influence of time horizon…Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self (2017)Digital health and the biopol…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)Recommendations for Conduct, …Country-Level Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Initial Estimates and the Need for Further Research (2016)Country-Level Cost-Effectiven…Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons (2016)Cost–effectiveness thresholds…Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2009)Decision Analysis and Cost-Ef…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials (2001)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Theory of games and economic behavior (2019)The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World (2003)Updating Cost-Effectiveness — The Curious Resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY Threshold (2014)The International Decision Support Initiative Reference Case for Economic Evaluation: An Aid to Thought (2016)The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion (2020)Determining the efficiency path to universal health coverage: cost-effectiveness thresholds for 174 countries based on growth in life expectancy and health expenditures (2023)Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Understanding Costs of Care in the Operating Room (2018)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations (2022)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation (2013)Thresholds for the cost–effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches (2014)Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold (2015)An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations (2021)Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value (2022)The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. (1979)The Subject and Power (1998)Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76 (2004)Data driven social partnerships: Exploring an emergent trend in search of research challenges and questions (2018)Understanding the Mechanism Between IT Identity, IT Mindfulness and Mobile Health Technology Continuance Intention: An Extended Expectation Confirmation Model (2021)Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data (2022)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Cost-effectiveness analysis of BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster vaccination in the United States (2022)Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies (2022)Economic evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review (2023)Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward (2019)Calculating and Interpreting ICERs and Net Benefit (2020)Cost-effectiveness Thresholds Used by Study Authors, 1990-2021 (2023)Risk factors for prolonged grief symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Efficacy of artificial intelligence in radiographic dental age estimation of patients undergoing dental maturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2025)Global prevalence and psychological impact of bullying among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,711 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2016Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses3,139 cited
  • 2016Country-Level Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Initial Estimates and the Need for Further Research889 cited
  • 2016Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons789 cited
  • 2017Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self262 cited
  • 2018Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future206 cited
  • 2020PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews170 cited
  • 2020Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health164 cited
  • 2009Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis141 cited
  • 2019Overview of Cost-effectiveness Analysis131 cited
  • 2018When is it too expensive? Cost-effectiveness thresholds and health care decision-making116 cited
  • 2017The influence of time horizon on results of cost-effectiveness analyses103 cited
  • 2020Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: Health-Economic Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial96 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Choosing a Time Horizon in Cost and Cost-effectiveness Analyses52 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.