SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of continuity correction methods in Cochrane reviews with single‐zero trials with rare events: A meta‐epidemiological study
10 references·1 citing·47 second hop
The impact of continuity correction methods in Cochrane reviews with single‐zero trials with rare events: A meta‐epidemiological study (2024)The impact of continuity correction metho…Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews (2021)Reporting of methods to prepa…Zero‐cell corrections in random‐effects meta‐analyses (2020)Zero‐cell corrections in rand…Network meta‐analysis of rare events using the Mantel‐Haenszel method (2019)Network meta‐analysis of rare…Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events (2018)Practical guide to the meta-a…The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure (2014)The Peto odds ratio viewed as…Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis (2014)Predictive distributions for …Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Much ado about nothing: a com…What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data (2004)What to add to nothing? Use a…A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters (2024)A re‐analysis of about 60,000…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review (2016)Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis (2019)Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Using the bayesmeta R Package (2020)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data (2010)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses (2018)Bias in the one‐step method for pooling study results (1990)Meta-Analysis with Binary Outcomes (2015)Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions (2020)Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies (2022)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Sleep in youth with autism spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective and objective studies (2018)Introduction to Meta-Analysis (2021)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random‐effects network meta‐analysis of binary data (2020)An evidence‐splitting approach to evaluation of direct‐indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta‐analysis (2021)Network meta‐analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression (2022)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin (2021)Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data (2021)Appealing to motivation to change attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 702 experimental tests of the effects of motivational message matching on persuasion. (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Data extraction and comparison for complex systematic reviews: a step-by-step guideline and an implementation example using open-source software (2023)Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey (2023)Evaluating the AI Tool “Elicit” as a Semi-Automated Second Reviewer for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Proof-of-Concept (2025)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
  • 2004What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data1,731 cited
  • 2006Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events938 cited
  • 2014Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis410 cited
  • 2018Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events230 cited
  • 2020Zero‐cell corrections in random‐effects meta‐analyses155 cited
  • 2019Network meta‐analysis of rare events using the Mantel‐Haenszel method108 cited
  • 2014The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure83 cited
  • 2021Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews24 cited

Cited by

  • 2024A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work