SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model (2024)Impact of redefining statistical signific…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005 (2018)The Proposal to Lower P Value…Redefine statistical significance (2017)Redefine statistical signific…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Editorial (2015)EditorialThe Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)The Statistical Crisis in Sci…Reproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceThe New Statistics (2013)The New StatisticsScientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaAn Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)An Agenda for Purely Confirma…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive Psychology“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …The Arrangement of Field Experiments (1992)The Arrangement of Field Expe…Strong Inference (1964)Strong InferenceThe Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management (1992)Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research (1992)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Sample Size Justification (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Small Telescopes (2015)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2013The New Statistics3,182 cited
  • 1964Strong Inference2,904 cited
  • 2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2012An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research1,041 cited
  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
  • 1992The Arrangement of Field Experiments964 cited
  • 2014The Statistical Crisis in Science959 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2018The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005654 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2015Editorial598 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work